CHP systems are required to meet environmental permitting requirements that regulate the emission of pollutants into the air. Commercial building owners and operators have not needed to be as concerned about airborne emissions as they will be if a CHP system is installed because customarily they relied on electricity from power plants and the serving utilities handled any environmental problems that had to be addressed. Owners and operators may have had to be aware of restrictions placed on the number of hours that standby generators could be operated each year, but their concerns ended there. That will not be the case when a CHP system is installed. The information is organized in the following sections:

• Air pollutants
• Pollution abatement technologies
• Emission rates
• Conversion of units
• Utilizing the Emission Reduction Estimator Tool

Air pollutants

Operation of any fuel-fired power generating equipment results in emissions of exhaust gases. Principal among these are carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor (H2O), oxides of nitrogen (NO and NO2, generally referred to as NOx), oxides of sulfur (SOx), carbon monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbons (UHC), and particulates. The environmental permitting requirements for on site generation impose restrictions on emissions of NOx, SOx, CO, and particulates because of their contributions to smog and acid rain. Regions of the U.S. with significant air quality problems are classified as “Non-Attainment Zones” and severe limits are placed on annual emissions of these pollutants in those areas. As a consequence, requirements for pollution abatement equipment are more stringent there.

The rates of emissions are depend on the quantities of fuel consumed, the type of fuel used, and the temperature of combustion. “Thermal” NOx emissions are a consequence of the high combustion temperatures; the higher the temperature level the greater the formation rate for NOx. This is true no matter what fuel is used. “Fuel based” NOx emissions are negligible in systems using natural gas, but they can be a significant source of pollution when fuel oil is used. SOx formation is a consequence of sulfur contained in the fuel and is insignificant for natural gas but must be considered when fuel oil or other fuels are used. Generally, technologies for reducing NOx and SOx emissions increase emissions of CO and UHCs.

Pollution abatement technologies

The least expensive mechanisms for reducing NOx emissions are based on lowering the combustion temperature to lower thermal NOx. This can be accomplished by injecting water or steam with the combustion air or by specialized designs of the combustion chambers. Exhaust gas treatment can be performed with non-selective or selective catalytic reduction (NSCR or SCR). NSCR causes CO to react with NOx in the presence of a catalyst to form CO2 and N2. In the case of SCR, an ammonia or urea solution is sprayed into the exhaust gases from the power generator where NH3 reacts with NOx in the presence of a catalyst to form nitrogen (N2) and water vapor (H2O). NSCR is commonly used in conjunction with rich-burn IC-engines while SCR is applied more often to gas turbines. Efficient operation of SCR requires careful control of the ammonia spray and the exhaust gas temperature. SCR can add $500 to $900 per kW to the cost of small gas turbines (<5 MW) and on the order of $250 per kW or less to larger turbines. Low NOx burners cost about the same as water or steam injection. Scrubbers can be used to reduce SOx emissions. This is accomplished by injecting calcium carbonate (CaCO3) in the form of a lime or limestone solution with SO2 in the exhaust gases to produce CaSO3 and CO2. Carbon monoxide can be forced to react with oxygen in the exhaust using a catalyst to form CO2. Wet and dry equipment are available to reduce particulates in the exhaust.

Emission rates

SCR and other catalytic processes can be added to reciprocating engine generators to reduce there emissions, as is commonly done with gas turbines. In both cases the reduced emissions come at the cost of increased maintenance and operating costs and may affect operating efficiencies.

Conversion of units

Emission rates for equipment can be reported in ppmv (parts per million, volume), pounds per million Btu of fuel (lb/MMBtu), or milligrams per mega-Joule of fuel (mg/MJ) and they are generally regulated in terms of tons per year. The conversion between units is not entirely straightforward, however, particularly when changing from ppm to lb/MMBtu or mg/MJ. This change is complicated because ppm incorporates the air flow rate which is not the same for all equipment. The amount of air required to oxidize a specific fuel is fixed (stoichiometric requirement), but different engine types use different amounts of excess” air. Lean burn IC engines may operate with around 100% excess air (200% of the stoichiometric rate) while gas turbines use 300 to 400% excess air; microturbines may use more the 800% excess air.

In September of 2001, the EPA initiated the CHP Partnership program. Partners in the program agreed to work with the EPA to develop and promote the benefits of new CHP projects. EPA will provide public recognition of projects and benefits to the company, public and the environment. EPA will also support accelerated development of new projects, through education, streamlined permitting and provision of technical tools and services. In a Press Release announcing the initiation of the CHP Partnership, Christie Whitman, Administrator of the EPA said that "Combined Heat and Power is not only better than conventional electricity generation at reducing air pollution and fuel consumption, it's more reliable and costs less to do so … Founding partners in this program are leading the way toward a cleaner future."

The existing CHP projects of the 17 founding partners represent more than 5,800 megawatts of power generating capacity, an amount capable of serving almost six million people (about the size of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area). The projects annually reduce the main global warming gas, carbon dioxide, by more than 8 million tons above what would achieved from traditional generation methods; in addition, the annual energy savings equal 19 million barrels of oil more than would be attained under conventional combustion.

EPA is also working to implement several other actions to promote cogeneration in the United States. EPA will be publishing soon in the Federal Register draft guidance clarifying the Clean Air Act requirements for constructing CHP facilities, to speed permitting and ensure that environmental benefits are fully realized. In another action, EPA will evaluate CHP applications under its Brownfields program.

More information on the EPA CHP Partnership can be found at their special CHP Partnership Web site at www.epa.gov/chp.

Click on the link to utilize the Emission Reduction Estimator tool.

About Us • Our Services • CHP Basics • Policies & Regulations
Applications & Markets • Opportunity Fuels • Region/State • Info Just for You • Installations & Contacts
• RAC Project Profiles • Evaluation Tools • Energy Prices • News/Events/Media • Library • Links

Home • Sitemap • Website Comments • Disclaimer